The Nationwide Data Expertise Company (NITA) has strongly defended its regulatory mandate and the legality of the charges and accreditation constructions imposed on info and communication know-how (ICT) firms and professionals, dismissing allegations circulating on social media that it’s illegally implementing the provisions of a invoice that has not but been handed by Parliament.
In an in depth press assertion issued on Could 22, 2026, NITA stated latest publications on social media platform
The company defined that the present regulatory framework governing ICT firms, fintech entities, e-commerce service suppliers and ICT professionals derives from mature current legal guidelines and legislative devices which have already been handed by Parliament, and never from the NITA invoice at the moment underneath session.
present regulation
In line with NITA, the charges and certification classes at the moment in place are based mostly on the Charges and Fees (Miscellaneous Provisions) Rules 2023 (LI 2481) and the Charges and Fees (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Modification) Rules 2025 (LI 2512).
The report stated the 2025 modification provisions have been made pursuant to powers granted underneath the Charges and Fees (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2022 (Act 1080).
“It is very important perceive that the prevailing charges, registration constructions, and certification classes operated by NITA aren’t applied underneath the proposed NITA invoice, which is at the moment in session with stakeholders,” the assertion stated.
“Subsequently, the declare that Congress is ‘not talking’ is fake,” it added.
The clarification comes within the wake of rising public debate over new ICT-related certification and registration charges coming to the NITA platform, with critics accusing the company and the Division of Communications, Digital Applied sciences and Innovation of searching for to operationalize provisions of future laws earlier than parliamentary approval.
regulatory authority
NITA argued that its powers pre-existed the proposed Invoice and have been firmly grounded in current laws, together with the Nationwide Data Expertise Authority Act 2008 (Act 771), the Digital Transactions Act 2008 (Act 772), the Charges and Charges (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2022 (Act 1080), and supporting laws handed underneath these Acts.
The company stated LI 2481 already accommodates provisions relating to the registration and annual renewal of ICT firms, ICT professionals, fintech operators and e-commerce suppliers.
“The suggestion that NITA has ‘created tomorrow’s energy at this time’ ignores the existence of authorized instruments already in operation,” the assertion confused.
NITA additional argued that the accusation of secretly implementing the proposed NITA invoice confuses two separate authorized processes.
He defined that whereas the proposed invoice continues to bear stakeholder session and legislative overview, the charges at the moment referenced come from a companion invoice that has already been enacted.
“Legislative devices submitted to Parliament and allowed to mature purchase authorized pressure underneath the constitutional framework of Ghana,” the assertion stated.
Costs are underneath overview
The company additionally straight responded to criticism of sure licensed charges displayed on digital platforms, asserting that the charges are neither arbitrary nor unconstitutional.
Among the many charges cited have been CHF 20,000 for the certification of fintech entities and CHF 10,000 for the certification of e-commerce service suppliers.
NITA stated these charges are explicitly included in LI 2512 and replicate the price of guaranteeing “secure, safe and resilient platforms” whereas defending digital shoppers.
“These aren’t the innovations of unofficial portals. They’re explicitly acknowledged in legislative paperwork handed underneath professional authority.”
The company denied accusations that it engaged in ultraviral exercise and maintained that its licensing and regulatory features are clearly established underneath present regulation.
It particularly pointed to sections 2 and three of Act 771, which oblige NITA to control the supply of ICT providers and preserve a register of licensed ICT service suppliers.
proposed invoice
The assertion defined that the proposed NITA invoice goals to modernize Ghana’s digital governance structure in response to rising applied sciences and evolving cybersecurity issues.
In line with NITA, the invoice goals to handle points similar to synthetic intelligence, cloud infrastructure, digital id ecosystem, cross-border digital transactions, and digital belief providers.
The company maintained that the legislative course of remained clear and constitutional.
He famous that the invoice remains to be in session with stakeholders and would require consideration by the Cupboard, overview by the Legal professional Common, parliamentary scrutiny underneath Article 106 of the Structure, and in the end presidential assent earlier than it turns into regulation.
“This course of itself demonstrates constitutional observance and democratic accountability,” the assertion stated.
Startup issues
NITA acknowledged issues raised by know-how startups, younger entrepreneurs, and innovation-focused firms relating to the potential impression of affordability and charges on digital innovation.
The company stated these issues are professional and the federal government stays open to constructive stakeholder engagement on charge changes, phased implementation, start-up exemptions, small enterprise protections, and innovation incentives.
Nevertheless, he cautioned towards inaccurate claims that current regulatory measures are unconstitutional.
“Public debate on digital governance is welcome and needed,” the assertion concluded.
“Nevertheless, such discussions should be based mostly on authorized precision, constitutional details, and accountable citizen participation.”
