Former Abuakwa South Member of Parliament Samuel Atta Akyea has questioned the practicality of makes an attempt to cease the Human Rights and Household Values ​​Invoice of 2025 from continuing.
He claimed that the invoice has already been validly handed by Parliament.
His feedback adopted considerations raised by Parliament Speaker Alban Bagbin, who referred to as for a evaluate of the circumstances surrounding the invoice’s passage earlier than it’s submitted for presidential assent.
Atta Akiya argued that when Parliament has accomplished its consideration of a invoice and the Speaker formally declares it handed, overturning the choice turns into a big procedural problem.
He famous that the invoice was accepted whereas the First Vice-Speaker was presiding over proceedings within the Home.
“I feel it is water underneath the bridge as a result of if he had crossed the bridge, he would not have been bodily there.”
“However the first vice-chairman presided over the proceedings and handed over the gavel. That is the top of the matter. The invoice has been formally handed. I feel it is too late to overturn the invoice. The subsequent step in making an attempt to finish the matter ought to be the assent of the president,” he mentioned.
Former members additional expressed uncertainty in regards to the authorized or procedural mechanisms they may depend on to reopen the matter after the legislative course of was accomplished.
“I’m wondering how the Speaker goes to make use of the foundations to overturn the conclusion. Possibly the Speaker has higher considering on this subject than I do, however that is a tall order,” he added.
Talking on Citi FM on Wednesday, June 3, 2026, Atta Akiya argued that the anti-LGBTQ invoice has basically completed its consideration in Parliament and will proceed to the subsequent constitutional stage, which might usually take into account presidential assent.
The Human Sexual Rights and Household Values ​​Act, generally known as an anti-LGBTQ invoice, was handed by Congress on Might 29, 2026.
However considerations raised by the speaker about elements of the method have sparked a brand new debate about whether or not the invoice ought to be reconsidered earlier than being despatched to the president.
