New Patriotic Celebration Common Secretary Justin Frimpong Koduah known as on the federal government to make sure equity within the software of the legislation, stressing that authorized procedures should not be influenced by political issues.
speak Pleasure FM high tales On Thursday, Could 14, Koduah stated on the current developments surrounding the remand of the get together’s Bono Regional Chairman, Kwame Baffour Abronye, ​​popularly often known as Abronye DC, that the NPP shouldn’t be against investigations or invites to get together members, however maintained that due course of ought to all the time be revered.
He stated the get together’s place is constant and primarily based on the assumption that the legislation ought to apply equally to all residents, no matter political affiliation.
“As a political get together, we consider that due course of should be adopted. We’re not involved about our members being invited by the present authorities. However all we wish to say is that if they’re invited, due course of should be adopted.”
Kodua claimed that some people had been being focused as a result of they criticized the federal government or took positions opposite to its views, and accused the present Nationwide Democratic Congress authorities of selectively making use of the legislation.
He stated the authorized course of shouldn’t be used as a political instrument in opposition to the opposition, however ought to be operated strictly inside the structure and established authorized requirements.
He additionally expressed concern in regards to the function of the judiciary on this matter and known as on the Bar Council of Ghana to make sure that judicial officers uphold skilled requirements and preserve their independence.
Relating to the choice to remand Mr. Avronje, he stated the judgment was alarming and inconsistent with established authorized ideas.
“With no prior conviction, how can a decide belief the prosecution’s argument that he might commit an analogous crime even when not remanded?” he requested.
He argued that remanding the politician for 4 weeks primarily based solely on unproven fees would create a harmful precedent and will result in a prolonged detention if the case dragged on for months.
He warned that public belief within the judiciary might be weakened if judges had been seen to be performing alongside political traces, including that judges should stay impartial and act inside skilled boundaries set by the structure and its code of conduct.
